|
Shown
above is a Colt®
bolt carrier and the CWS
array. The darker of the
two weight inserts is a
tungsten
carbide.
|
|
CLICK
TO SEE
PHOTOS
|
|
|
|
|
Author's note:
This material
was written some time
ago and I can say that
now, yes, I use this
product in EVERY AR15
and AR10 I have. The CWS
is an amazingly
effective component and
I've yet to see it cause
the first problem in
function. I now also
"automatically" stick
the heaviest weight in
the unit (the carbide)
and also have yet to see
a rifle that didn't work
with
thataway.
-- G. Zediker,
2004
|
|
MY
TAKE...
by
Glen Zediker
author, The Competitive
AR15
David Tubb
has been sending a few new things
"our" way, and here's one that's
too simple and too good to
believe. His "CWS" which stands
for "carrier weight system" is a
drop in part for any AR15 or
AR-10/SR-25. It delays the
unlocking of the bolt, which
gives pressures some time to head
in the right direction (which is
not toward the case head). The
result is that the ammunition in
your AR15 doesn't produce any
less pressure, but it sho "takes"
more.
What it
is
The CWS unit is a tapered
steel cylinder with a flange on
one end. The part slips into the
back of a bolt carrier and stops
against the flange. When
installed, the whole thing is
trapped by the buffer and bolt
carrier. Can't come loose. The
CWS housing is hollow to accept
one of two available weight
inserts, a stainless steel and a
tungsten carbide. The CWS part
alone weighs about one and a half
ounces. The stainless insert
weighs about that much again, and
the carbide is, by itself, about
two and a half ounces. That's a
potential for adding quite a lot
of weight.
What it
does
The CWS delays bolt
unlocking. It increases the
moment of inertia since it adds
weight to the carrier. It doesn't
reduce pressure, but that's the
effect on the cartridge case and
primer. There has been a notable
difference in the condition of my
cases fired with stuffed
loads.
The other
thing it does is shorten the
distance between bolt and bolt
stop at full recoil positions.
This happens simply because there
is an 0.080 thick flange on the
CWS. Reducing carrier overrun
shortens the return of the bolt
into and against the stop. This
hasn't really been much problem
with AR15s, but broken bolt stops
are commonplace on the AR-10 and
SR-25. Despite the extra weight
the carrier is packing, the run
back being shorter makes more
positive difference.
What it
did
It's hard to make too much of
a claim on the part since, one,
I've only used it in a couple of
rifles, and, two, I'm not
"representing" the product
officially. But. I think it's way
safe to see that anyone will
notice a difference in the
behavior of the rifle and in the
condition of the spent cases. I
can't say that CWS is going to
stop most primer launching and
primer piercing problems (bolt
and firing pin have a whopping
lot to do with that, as in
"almost everything") but it sho
did in my case.
I think
this part is of perhaps most
benefit, which is to say may
provide more noticeable
improvements, in a Colt®
equipped with the receiver block.
The block, of course, means that
only a Colt® bolt carrier can
be used, and that is the lightest
carrier out there. The CWS is the
only way to increase a Colt®
to "heavy carrier"
status.
What
else
It's easy enough to install,
but the only glitch is that the
upper and lower receivers have to
be separated at both ends (remove
front and rear takedown pins) to
get it situated. Again, the
flange makes it improbable
(didn't say "impossible") to
hinge the rear receiver off the
front pin and close the units in
normal fashion. Not a big deal,
but have to keep the screwdrivers
handy for a Colt®. Other
rifles with front and rear push
pins are easy. It's worth the
trouble. I won't again fire a
Colt® competition Service
Rifle without mine.
I'm pretty
elated about this part. It
literally "saved" a rifle for me,
or at least got it back in
favored status. The Colt® I
installed CWS in never would get
to speed without serious
symptoms, now it's a glutton for
punishment.
See
note at end.
|

|
|

|
Without
CWS at 23.0gr H4895 and
Sierra
80.
|
|
x
|
|
|

|
With
CWS at 25.0gr H4895 and
Sierra 80.
Folks,
this is NOT a
recommended load. Even
though the case held
together and the primer
did too, just look at
the extractor marks and
ejector imprint on this
po head. Don't use this
load. Just know what it
means to this article
and my evaluation of
CWS.
|
|
|
Very
important
note -- In
this example I
am in no way
insinuating
that CWS will
or should allow
anyone to
increase a
powder charge
in this amount,
or even close
to it. Point is
that overt
symptoms of
excessive
pressure were
abated in this
seriously over
pressure load.
Don't take this
any other
way!
|
|
|
x
What's Else
Big
deal is that I didn't yet do the
big deal, which is the carbide
weight. My results came from the
stainless steel insert. The
carbide adds another third. More
to come, rest assured. I have no
doubt that the carbide will
"work" in this Service
Rifle.
|